Original Report

Practice gaps and barriers to optimal care of hematologic malignancies in the United States


 

Background Treating patients with hematologic malignancies can be challenging for physicians because of the rapidly evolving standards of care and relatively low incidence of these diseases.

Objective To identify clinical challenges among hematologists and medical oncologists regarding the provision of care to patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or B-cell lymphomas.

Methods Hematologists and medical oncologists in active practice in the United States and who have a case load of ≥ 1 patient a year with CML, ALL, or B-cell lymphoma were recruited. The initial qualitative phase consisted of an online case-based survey followed by an interview exploring the contextual and behavioral factors that influence treatment decisions (n = 27). The analysis of qualitative data then informed a quantitative phase, in which 121 participants completed an online survey composed of case vignettes, multiple choice, and semantic differential rating scale questions. The respondents’ answers were compared with recommendations from treatment guidelines and faculty experts.

Results A higher frequency of bone marrow biopsies was reported compared with expert faculty recommendations by 74% of oncologists. Many respondents failed to recognize the clinical relevance of BCR-ABL mutations other than T315I. Respondents reported perceiving difficulties in individualizing treatment and interpreting response to treatment in patients with ALL and B-cell lymphomas. Fewer than 30% of respondents recognized the mechanisms of action of 5 of the 9 promising investigational agents presented.

Limitations Participant self-selection bias is a possibility because participation was voluntary. Practice gaps are not based on clinical data, but hypothetical case situations and self-report.

Conclusions Findings from this study can guide education to address the identified challenges in caring for patients with hematologic malignancies and improving patient care.

Funding This needs assessment was financially supported with an educational research grant from Pfizer Medical Education Group to the Annenberg Center for Health Sciences at Eisenhower.

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

Recommended Reading

Exercise boosts anticancer effects of doxorubicin
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Idelalisib approved to treat CLL, FL in EU
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Disrupting equilibrium to fight AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Predicting chemo drugs’ effects on male fertility
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Drug shows activity in models of pediatric ALL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA approves new treatment for PI
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Antifungal shows promise in hematologic conditions
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Patients with Ph-like ALL may benefit from TKIs
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Discovery could lead to better proteasome inhibitors
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Drug shows early promise for hematologic malignancies
MDedge Hematology and Oncology